Evidence, not propaganda.
I’m open to questions regarding anything surrounding the subject of… well… atheism, and religion.
I’ll answer anything. Probably. I can’t promise it won’t be a rant, though.
Teach me to rely on my abilities, not an invisible deity.
Perfection and divintiy are both abstract, they are defined upon what we decide as an individual. Additionally, they’re both obsecure concepts simply because they are subjective. It’s not only this, but other abstracts such as beauty, friendship etc. They understandably differ, but still hold similarities. This is due to the fact that they can be referred to with examples in the ‘real’ material world.
Perfection and divinity, however, cannot. There are no references in the real world because there is little definition… (Because there aren’t any really.) The notion of impossibility is already included in our vague conceptions of these two abstracts. In fact, it’s their whole point. It’s their main characteristic: Being ‘impossible’.
Therefore in essence, there is no definition of god, godliness, the divine and so on because these words are somewhat empty. There is no consensus on their meanings, so you can fill them with whatever you like. They are semantically empty.
And since these words are all that exists of any ‘god’ (Perfection, divinity etc.) God cannot exist.